MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/jom.0000000000000080

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2014

Is carpal tunnel syndrome related to computer exposure at work? A review and meta-analysis.

Mediouni Zakia, de Roquemaurel Alexis, Dumontier Christian, Becour Bertrand, Garrabe Hélène, Roquelaure Yves, Descatha Alexis

СтатьяМетаанализОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

A meta-analysis on epidemiological studies was undertaken to assess association between carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and computer work.

METHODS

Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Base de Donnees de Sante Publique) were searched with cross-references from published reviews. We included recent studies, original epidemiological studies for which the association was assessed with blind reviewing with control group. Relevant associations were extracted, and a metarisk was calculated using the generic variance approach (meta-odds ratio [meta-OR]).

RESULTS

Six studies met the criteria for inclusion. Results are contradictory because of heterogeneous work exposure. The meta-OR for computer use was 1.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 3.55). The meta-OR for keyboarding was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.62 to 1.98) and for mouse 1.94 (95% CI, 0.90 to 4.21).

CONCLUSION

It was not possible to show an association between computer use and CTS, although some particular work circumstances may be associated with CTS.

Для цитирования: Mediouni Zakia, de Roquemaurel Alexis, Dumontier Christian, Becour Bertrand, Garrabe Hélène, Roquelaure Yves, Descatha Alexis. Is carpal tunnel syndrome related to computer exposure at work? A review and meta-analysis.. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2014. DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000000080.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.