MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5704/moj.1303.008

Медицинская библиотека · Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2013

The effects of working hours on nerve conduction test in computer operators.

Ganeriwal Aa, Biswas DA, Srivastava Tk

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Long hours of work at a computer can result in potential adverse effects such as pain, paraesthesia, and subjective weakness of upper extremities with associated decreased nerve conduction velocities of peripheral nerves (median and ulnar).

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether repetitive tasks performed for long hours by computer operators can lead to peripheral neuropathy as measured by nerve conduction studies of upper extremities.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

We performed nerve conduction tests on 50 computer operators in two study groups. Group I consisted of computer operators who worked a minimum of 6 hours per day at the computer while Group II worked a maximum of 2 hours per day.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed between groups for most physical signs. In addition, there were significant differences between the groups for nerve conduction velocities of the medial (motor & sensory) and ulnar (motor & sensory) nerves.

CONCLUSION

We found symptoms of pain, paraesthesia and subjective weaknesses as well as decreased conduction velocities of peripheral nerves in computer operators who work long hours. Further nerve conduction studies are needed to confirm predictive value for the development of carpal tunnel syndrome.

KEY WORDS: computer operator, long work hours, nerve conduction studies.

Для цитирования: Ganeriwal Aa, Biswas DA, Srivastava Tk. The effects of working hours on nerve conduction test in computer operators.. Malaysian orthopaedic journal. 2013. DOI: 10.5704/moj.1303.008.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.