Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2025
Accuracy of early shock recognition by paramedics: a multicenter prospective observational study in Japan.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tanohata Rina, Saito Katsutoshi, Nagano Takehiko, Ochiai Hidenobu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Early recognition of shock status by paramedics significantly affects patient prognosis; however, its accuracy remains unclear. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of paramedics in classifying shock and the characteristics of misdiagnoses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter prospective observational study compared the on-scene shock diagnoses of paramedics between July 2022 and June 2023 with those of physicians upon hospital arrival.
RESULTS: The overall diagnostic accuracy for shock revealed substantial agreement (k=0.64), whereas diagnosis by category ranged from slight to moderate agreement (k=0.11-0.51). Patients without systolic hypotension were more frequently missed during diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced clinical education is needed to improve the accuracy of shock diagnosis by paramedics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter prospective observational study compared the on-scene shock diagnoses of paramedics between July 2022 and June 2023 with those of physicians upon hospital arrival.
RESULTS: The overall diagnostic accuracy for shock revealed substantial agreement (k=0.64), whereas diagnosis by category ranged from slight to moderate agreement (k=0.11-0.51). Patients without systolic hypotension were more frequently missed during diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced clinical education is needed to improve the accuracy of shock diagnosis by paramedics.