MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2460/ajvr.22.11.0189

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of veterinary research · 2023

A biomechanical comparison of a novel two-loop suture technique and two sutures for laryngoplasty in the horse.

Wilson David G, Roquet Imma, Tucker Michelle L, Carmalt James L

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of the strength of the novel suture technique by comparison with a 2-interrupted suture technique.

SAMPLE: 40 equine larynges.

PROCEDURES: 40 larynges were used; 16 laryngoplasties were performed using the currently accepted 2-suture technique and 16 using the novel suture technique. These specimens were subjected to a single cycle to failure. Eight specimens were used to compare the rima glottidis area achieved with 2 different techniques.

RESULTS

The mean force to failure, as well as the rima glottidis area of both constructs, were not significantly different. The cricoid width did not have a significant effect on the force to failure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results suggest that both constructs are equally strong and can achieve a similar cross-sectional area of the rima glottidis. Laryngoplasty ("tie-back") is currently the treatment of choice for horses with exercise intolerance due to recurrent laryngeal neuropathy. Failure to maintain the expected degree of arytenoid abduction post-surgery occurs in some horses. We believe this novel 2-loop pulley load-sharing suture technique can help achieve and, more importantly, maintain the desired degree of abduction during surgery.

Для цитирования: Wilson David G, Roquet Imma, Tucker Michelle L, Carmalt James L. A biomechanical comparison of a novel two-loop suture technique and two sutures for laryngoplasty in the horse.. American journal of veterinary research. 2023. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.22.11.0189.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.