American journal of surgery · 2008
Gamma probe identification of normal parathyroid glands during central neck surgery can facilitate parathyroid preservation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Grubbs Elizabeth G, Mittendorf Elizabeth A, Perrier Nancy D, Lee Jeffrey E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We evaluated gamma probe identification (GPI) of sestamibi-labeled normal parathyroid glands during central neck surgery.
METHODS: GPI was judged to be helpful if it resulted in the identification of parathyroid glands not identified by direct inspection.
RESULTS: GPI was performed in 54 patients and was helpful in 20, including 9 patients in whom GPI identified intact parathyroid glands in vivo and 11 patients in whom GPI identified incidentally excised parathyroid glands ex vivo in the central neck dissection (CND) specimen. GPI was more commonly helpful in patients who underwent reoperation (9/16, 56%) compared with primary surgery (11/38, 29%; P = .04) and was more commonly helpful in patients who underwent CND (17/28, 61%) compared with thyroidectomy without CND (2/26, 8%; P < .0001). In 11 patients, normal parathyroid glands were salvaged by GPI from the ex vivo CND specimens and autografted.
CONCLUSIONS: GPI is a relatively simple and effective technique that may help maximize parathyroid preservation.
METHODS: GPI was judged to be helpful if it resulted in the identification of parathyroid glands not identified by direct inspection.
RESULTS: GPI was performed in 54 patients and was helpful in 20, including 9 patients in whom GPI identified intact parathyroid glands in vivo and 11 patients in whom GPI identified incidentally excised parathyroid glands ex vivo in the central neck dissection (CND) specimen. GPI was more commonly helpful in patients who underwent reoperation (9/16, 56%) compared with primary surgery (11/38, 29%; P = .04) and was more commonly helpful in patients who underwent CND (17/28, 61%) compared with thyroidectomy without CND (2/26, 8%; P < .0001). In 11 patients, normal parathyroid glands were salvaged by GPI from the ex vivo CND specimens and autografted.
CONCLUSIONS: GPI is a relatively simple and effective technique that may help maximize parathyroid preservation.