MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.026

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 2008

Gamma probe identification of normal parathyroid glands during central neck surgery can facilitate parathyroid preservation.

Grubbs Elizabeth G, Mittendorf Elizabeth A, Perrier Nancy D, Lee Jeffrey E

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

We evaluated gamma probe identification (GPI) of sestamibi-labeled normal parathyroid glands during central neck surgery.

METHODS

GPI was judged to be helpful if it resulted in the identification of parathyroid glands not identified by direct inspection.

RESULTS

GPI was performed in 54 patients and was helpful in 20, including 9 patients in whom GPI identified intact parathyroid glands in vivo and 11 patients in whom GPI identified incidentally excised parathyroid glands ex vivo in the central neck dissection (CND) specimen. GPI was more commonly helpful in patients who underwent reoperation (9/16, 56%) compared with primary surgery (11/38, 29%; P = .04) and was more commonly helpful in patients who underwent CND (17/28, 61%) compared with thyroidectomy without CND (2/26, 8%; P < .0001). In 11 patients, normal parathyroid glands were salvaged by GPI from the ex vivo CND specimens and autografted.

CONCLUSIONS

GPI is a relatively simple and effective technique that may help maximize parathyroid preservation.

Для цитирования: Grubbs Elizabeth G, Mittendorf Elizabeth A, Perrier Nancy D, Lee Jeffrey E. Gamma probe identification of normal parathyroid glands during central neck surgery can facilitate parathyroid preservation.. American journal of surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.026.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.