MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1067/mic.2002.123347

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of infection control · 2002

Prescribing practice for antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section in a teaching hospital in Brazil.

Heineck Isabela, Ferreira Maria B C, Schenkel Eloir Paulo

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The contribution of antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce surgical wound infection and endometritis after cesarean section is well-known. Despite the knowledge about the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis with this procedure, the administrative regimens are often inappropriate.

METHODS

The use of antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section was evaluated in a reference school hospital. Data were collected from medical records, and they correspond to the 9-month observation during 1995 and 1996.

RESULTS

The cesarean section rate was 26.4% in this period. The total procedures observed was 587. Antibiotic prophylaxis was prescribed in 358 procedures (61%). Cephalothin was the most prescribed drug (98.6%), with a regimen of 2 g intravenously after clamping of the umbilical cord and 2 more doses of 1g every 6 hours. Antibiotic prophylaxis was indicated more frequently in patients younger than 30 years and in those with rupture of membranes for more than 6 hours; such differences were significant (P <.05 and P <.00001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The prescribers met the hospital guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in only 37.1% of the cesarean sections performed.

Для цитирования: Heineck Isabela, Ferreira Maria B C, Schenkel Eloir Paulo. Prescribing practice for antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section in a teaching hospital in Brazil.. American journal of infection control. 2002. DOI: 10.1067/mic.2002.123347.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.