MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ccd.27919

Медицинская библиотека · Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2018

Bioresorbable polymer-coated thin strut sirolimus-eluting stent vs durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in daily clinical practice: Propensity matched one-year results from interventional cardiology network registry.

Gasior Pawel, Gierlotka Marek, Szczurek-Katanski Krzysztof, Osuch Marcin, Gnot Roman, Hawranek Michał, Gasior Mariusz, Polonski Lech

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the 1-year clinical follow-up in patients treated with the thin strut (71 μm) bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) vs durable coating everolimus eluting stent (DP-EES) in daily clinical routine.

BACKGROUND

Presence of durable polymers may be associated with late/very late stent thrombosis occurrence and the need for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy. Bioabsorbable polymers may facilitate stent healing, thus enhancing clinical safety.

METHODS

Interventional Cardiology Network Registry is a prospective, multicenter, observational registry of 21,400 consecutive patients treated with PCI since 2010. We analyzed 4,670 patients treated with either a BP-SES (ALEX, Balton, Poland) or DP-EES (XIENCE, Abbott, USA) with available 1-year clinical follow-up using propensity-score matching. Outcomes included target vessel revascularization (TVR) as efficacy outcome and all cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and definite/probable stent thrombosis as safety outcomes.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 1,649 patients treated with BP-SES and 1,649 patients treated with DP-EES were selected. Procedural and clinical characteristics were similar between both groups. There was no significant difference between tested groups in in-hospital mortality. One-year follow-up demonstrated comparable efficacy outcome, TVR (BP-SES 5.9% vs DP-EES 4.6% P = 0.45), as well as comparable safety outcomes, all cause death, MI and definite/probable stent thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter registry, the BP-SES thin strut biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes at 1-year after implantation to the DP-EES. These data support the relative safety and efficacy of DP-SES in a broad range of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Для цитирования: Gasior Pawel, Gierlotka Marek, Szczurek-Katanski Krzysztof, Osuch Marcin, Gnot Roman, Hawranek Michał, Gasior Mariusz, Polonski Lech. Bioresorbable polymer-coated thin strut sirolimus-eluting stent vs durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in daily clinical practice: Propensity matched one-year results from interventional cardiology network registry.. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2018. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27919.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.