Myeloma of Laryngeal Cartilage: Literature Review and Case Study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Myeloma of laryngeal cartilage (MLC) is a rare plasma cell neoplasm which has not been well characterized. However, it is an important differential diagnosis of laryngeal cartilage mass as it can indicate the presence of underlying systemic hematological diseases, such as multiple myeloma (MM), that is associated with poor prognosis. This article is the first of its kind and aims to educate clinicians on future diagnosis and management of similar cases.
METHODS
Search of MLC was performed on the medical literature databases of Medline, PUBMED, and EMBASE. Additionally, institutional database at Gold Coast University Hospital Radiology Department was queried for relevant cases. Based on 16 cases that met the inclusion criteria, the etiology, epidemiology, clinical evaluation, investigations, management, and prognosis of MLC was summarized.
RESULTS
Of all, 94% of MLC occur in males and 81% in those older than 60 years. It is more commonly a manifestation of systemic MM, rather than localized extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP), 81% and 19% respectively. Additionally, 67% of laryngeal EMPs progress to MM within 3 years from initial diagnosis. Although treatments involving both local and systemic therapy were effective at relieving local symptoms, 39% of MLC patients died during the follow-up period-all of which were due to septicemia caused by secondary infections.
CONCLUSION
Myeloma of laryngeal cartilage is a relatively rare condition that requires accurate diagnosis in order to promptly manage the potentially underlying systemic hematological disease. Currently, more case reports and analytical studies are required to provide evidence-based guidance on etiology, diagnosis, and management of this condition.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.