ANZ journal of surgery · 2021
Establishing a novel method for assessing elasticity of internal anal sphincter using ultrasonic real-time tissue elastography.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fukui Risa, Sasaki Kazuhito, Kawai Kazushige, Taira Tetsuro, Nozawa Hiroaki, Kaneko Manabu, Murono Koji, Emoto Shigenobu, Iida Yuuki, Ishii Hiroaki, Yokoyama Yuichiro, Anzai Hiroyuki, Sonoda Hirofumi, Ishihara Soichiro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Evaluating anorectal function using real-time tissue elastography (RTE) has not been reported. A previous study reported that in the internal anal sphincter (IAS) of surgical specimens of patients with rectal cancer who underwent abdominoperineal resection, there was an increased fibrosis trend in those who underwent pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) compared with non-CRT. We speculated that CRT might have induced sclerosis of the IAS because of fibrosis. Therefore, we aimed to establish a method of quantitating the degree of IAS hardness using RTE on endoanal ultrasonography.
METHODS: RTE was performed with freehand manual compression under a defined pressure at the middle anal canal. Using the most compressive point in the strain graph, we traced the region of interest in the IAS. The strain histogram showed a frequency distribution of colours according to the degree of strain (numeric scan ranging from 0 to 255; smaller number indicated harder tissue). We defined the mean of the strain histogram as 'elasticity'. Ten patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent pre-operative CRT were prospectively enrolled. We statistically evaluated the correlation between IAS elasticity and maximum resting pressure (MRP) values both at pre- and post-CRT. MRP was examined concurrently with the examination of IAS elasticity.
RESULTS: Representativity of elasticity measurements was demonstrated. It revealed a trend: IAS elasticity had a moderate inverse correlation with MRP (r = 0.41, P = 0.07), regardless of whether measurements were made before or after CRT.
CONCLUSION: We established a completely novel method for the assessment of elasticity of the IAS, using RTE on endoanal ultrasonography.
METHODS: RTE was performed with freehand manual compression under a defined pressure at the middle anal canal. Using the most compressive point in the strain graph, we traced the region of interest in the IAS. The strain histogram showed a frequency distribution of colours according to the degree of strain (numeric scan ranging from 0 to 255; smaller number indicated harder tissue). We defined the mean of the strain histogram as 'elasticity'. Ten patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent pre-operative CRT were prospectively enrolled. We statistically evaluated the correlation between IAS elasticity and maximum resting pressure (MRP) values both at pre- and post-CRT. MRP was examined concurrently with the examination of IAS elasticity.
RESULTS: Representativity of elasticity measurements was demonstrated. It revealed a trend: IAS elasticity had a moderate inverse correlation with MRP (r = 0.41, P = 0.07), regardless of whether measurements were made before or after CRT.
CONCLUSION: We established a completely novel method for the assessment of elasticity of the IAS, using RTE on endoanal ultrasonography.