MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00192-008-0788-3

Медицинская библиотека · International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction · 2009

Prophylactic ureteral catheterization in gynecologic surgery: a 12-year randomized trial in a community hospital.

Chou Mou-Tsy, Wang Chung-Jing, Lien Ray-Chang

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of preoperative ureteral catheterization as a prophylactic measure to prevent ureteral injury and related complications.

METHODS

All major gynecologic operations performed between January 1996 and December 2007 were included and prospectively randomized into with and without catheterization groups. The medical records allowed the identification of all urinary tract complications and ureteral injuries.

RESULTS

Bilateral prophylactic ureteral catheterization was performed in 1,583 patients. A ureteral injury occurred in 19 (1.20%) out of 1,583 patients. Seventeen ureteral injuries (1.09%) occurred out of 1,558 patients without prophylactic ureteral catheterization. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of ureteral injury between the different interventional groups (p = 0.774).

CONCLUSION

The use of prophylactic ureteral catheters did not eliminate ureteral injuries in our patients. The presence of ureteral catheters should not supplant meticulous surgical techniques and direct visualization of the ureters during gynecologic surgery.

Для цитирования: Chou Mou-Tsy, Wang Chung-Jing, Lien Ray-Chang. Prophylactic ureteral catheterization in gynecologic surgery: a 12-year randomized trial in a community hospital.. International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0788-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.