Glottal Imaging Study Comparing Vowel Phonation with Semioccluded Vocal Tract Exercises (SOVTEs) Produced Loudly.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to estimate vocal loading in loud phonation of a vowel and two widely used semiocclusion voice exercises (SOVTEs). Impact stress (IS) was estimated from glottal closing speed, inertial forces from the second derivative of glottal opening and closing.

STUDY

DESIGN

Experimental study in vivo.

METHODS

A vocally healthy male sustained the [o:] vowel with habitual loudness and loudly: (1) without a tube, (2) into a silicone "Lax Vox" type tube (35 cm in length, 10 mm in diameter) outer end submerged 10 cm in water, and (3) into a straw (length 12.6 cm, diameter 2.5 mm) the outer end in air. He tried to use equal effort in all loud samples. High-speed video-laryngo-endoscopy was performed with a rigid scope. Oral air pressure (Poral) was registered in a mouthpiece through which the endoscope was inserted into the larynx and to which the tubes were attached air-tightly.

RESULTS

Compared with vowel phonation at habitual loudness, mean of maximal glottal width (max GW) increased by 44.1% for loud tube phonation and decreased by 1.8% for loud straw phonation, and mean absolute value of minimum GW time derivative dmin increased by 57.1% for tube and by 29.5% for straw suggesting faster glottal closing. Compared with loud vowel phonation, max GW increased by 22.6% for loud tube phonation, while it decreased by 16.6% for loud straw phonation. For the tube, dmindecreased by 7.6% and for the straw by 23.8%. Maximal acceleration (ACC) and deceleration (DC) values were larger for the tube and smaller for the straw than the values for both vowel phonations.

CONCLUSIONS

IS, deduced from dmin, increased in loud SOVTEs compared to vowel phonation at a conversational loudness, but remained lower in loud SOVTEs than in loud vowel phonation, particularly with a narrow straw, which also reduced inertial forces, as suggested by the reduced ACC and DC.