MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.vaa.2020.02.006

Медицинская библиотека · Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia · 2020

Comparison of mainstream (Capnostat 5) and two low-flow sidestream capnometers (VM-2500-S and Capnostream) in spontaneously breathing rabbits anesthetized with a Bain coaxial breathing system.

Duke-Novakovski Tanya, Fujiyama Masako, Beazley Shannon G

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate agreement with PaCO2 of two low sampling rate sidestream capnometers and a mainstream capnometer in rabbits and the effect of using high fresh gas flow from a Bain coaxial breathing system.

STUDY

DESIGN

Prospective, crossover study.

ANIMALS: A total of 10 New Zealand White rabbits weighing 3.4 ± 0.3 kg [mean ± standard deviation (SD)].

METHODS

Two sidestream analyzers (Viamed VM-2500-S and Capnostream 35) with a sampling rate of 50 mL minute-1 and a mainstream capnometer (Capnostat 5) were tested. All capnometers used infrared spectroscopy and advanced microprocessor technology. Rabbits were anesthetized and intubated with noncuffed endotracheal tubes of 3 mm internal diameter and adequate seal. A sidestream sampling adapter or the mainstream capnometer was attached to the endotracheal tube and connected to a Bain coaxial breathing system. Oxygen (1.5 L minute-1) delivered sevoflurane to maintain anesthesia. An auricular artery catheter allowed blood sampling for PaCO2 analysis corrected to rectal temperature. Inspired and end-tidal carbon dioxide (Pe'CO2) measurements were recorded during blood sample withdrawal. From each rabbit, 10 paired PaCO2/Pe'CO2 measurements were obtained. Each rabbit was recovered from anesthesia and was anesthetized again with an alternate capnometer after 1 week. Data were analyzed using Bland-Altman and two-way anova for repeated measures.

RESULTS

Analysis included 100 paired samples. Negative bias reflects underestimation of PaCO2. Bland-Altman mean (±1.95 SD) was -16.7 (-35.2 to 1.8) mmHg for Capnostat 5, -27.9 (-48.6 to -7.2) mmHg for Viamed, and -18.1 (-34.3 to -1.9) mmHg for Capnostream. Viamed PaCO2-Pe'CO2 gradient was greater than other two capnometers.

CONCLUSIONS

All three capnometers underestimated PaCO2. Capnostat 5 and Capnostream performed similarly.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These capnometers underestimated PaCO2 in spontaneously breathing rabbits anesthetized using a Bain coaxial breathing system with high fresh gas flows.

Для цитирования: Duke-Novakovski Tanya, Fujiyama Masako, Beazley Shannon G. Comparison of mainstream (Capnostat 5) and two low-flow sidestream capnometers (VM-2500-S and Capnostream) in spontaneously breathing rabbits anesthetized with a Bain coaxial breathing system.. Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaa.2020.02.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.