MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.27598

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2023

Machine learning approach to predict tracheal necrosis after total pharyngolaryngectomy.

Hidaka Takeaki, Miyamoto Shimpei, Furuse Kiichi, Oshima Azusa, Matsuura Kazuto, Higashino Takuya

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Tracheal necrosis is a potentially severe complication of total pharyngolarynjectomy (TPL), sometimes combined with total esophagectomy. The risk factors for tracheal necrosis after TPL without total esophagectomy remain unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of 395 patients who underwent TPL without total esophagectomy. Relevant factors associated with tracheal necrosis were evaluated using random forest machine learning and traditional multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Tracheal necrosis occurred in 25 (6.3%) patients. Both the models identified almost the same factors relevant to tracheal necrosis. History of radiotherapy was the most important predicting and significant risk factor in both models. Paratracheal lymph node dissection and total thyroidectomy with TPL were also relevant. Random forest model was able to predict tracheal necrosis with an accuracy of 0.927.

CONCLUSIONS

Random forest is useful in predicting tracheal necrosis. Countermeasures should be considered when creating a tracheostoma, particularly in patients with identified risk factors.

Для цитирования: Hidaka Takeaki, Miyamoto Shimpei, Furuse Kiichi, Oshima Azusa, Matsuura Kazuto, Higashino Takuya. Machine learning approach to predict tracheal necrosis after total pharyngolaryngectomy.. Head & neck. 2023. DOI: 10.1002/hed.27598.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.