DOI 10.26355/eurrev_202309_33775
Ultrasonographic evaluation of the postoperative airway edema after robotic prostatectomy: a single center observational study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
During general anesthesia, different parts of the upper airway can change for various reasons, such as intravenous fluids, airway trauma due to airway devices used, stasis in tissues due to position, reactions to medications used, etc. For many reasons, edema in the airway or the surrounding tissue can narrow the airway. This study compares preoperative and postoperative ultrasound measurements of upper airway anatomy in patients with robotic radical prostatectomy in the Trendelenburg position.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
This study was conducted at the Health Sciences University Ankara City Hospital between May and December 2022. The preoperative and postoperative measurements of tongue thickness, midsagittal tongue cross-sectional area, tongue width, lateral pharyngeal wall thickness, parapharyngeal region thickness, and submental region thickness were analyzed and compared.
RESULTS
There was a difference between the preoperative and postoperative median sagittal tongue cross-sectional area, tongue volume values, LPW values, parapharyngeal region thickness, and neck circumference values. We found that the thickness of the submental region and the thickness of the parapharyngeal region increased as the amount of fluid administered intraoperatively increased.
CONCLUSIONS
Upper airway edema is the most challenging problem for anesthetists during extubation due to position and pneumoperitoneum. Restrictive fluid management may have beneficial effects in preventing clinically important airway edema.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.