Surgical neurology · 2008
Migration of pump for intrathecal drug delivery into the peritoneal cavity. Case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vanhauwaert Dimitri J, Kalala Jean-Pierre O, Baert Edward, Hallaert Giorgio, Crombez Erwin, Caemaert Jacques, Van Roost Dirk
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We report on a patient in whom a subfascially implanted pump for the intrathecal delivery of baclofen spontaneously migrated into the peritoneal cavity.
CASE DESCRIPTION: A 54-year-old male patient presented with a refilling problem of a drug pump that had been implanted 16 months earlier subfascially through a right-sided incision 10 cm below the costal margin. Because we were unable to refill the pump even under fluoroscopy, we presumed a backward turning of the pump. At exploration, we found that the deeper part of the pocket had spontaneously eroded and had caused the migration of the pump into the peritoneal cavity. The peritoneum and the abdominal wall were closed and the pump was placed in a subcutaneous pouch. We suppose that the migration of the pump was due to its particular implantation site with the lower extent of the device at or below the level of the linea semilunaris. Below this line, the aponeuroses of all 3 lateral abdominal muscles pass in front of the rectus muscle, leaving only the transversal fascia underneath the rectus, which is not a solid layer. Not considering this anatomical detail may facilitate the inward migration of implanted material.
CONCLUSION: When creating a pocket for subfascial implantation, a high subcostal incision should be used so that the lower extent of the pocket will still be above the level of the linea semilunaris, hence ensuring a strong fascial layer between the pump and the peritoneum.
CASE DESCRIPTION: A 54-year-old male patient presented with a refilling problem of a drug pump that had been implanted 16 months earlier subfascially through a right-sided incision 10 cm below the costal margin. Because we were unable to refill the pump even under fluoroscopy, we presumed a backward turning of the pump. At exploration, we found that the deeper part of the pocket had spontaneously eroded and had caused the migration of the pump into the peritoneal cavity. The peritoneum and the abdominal wall were closed and the pump was placed in a subcutaneous pouch. We suppose that the migration of the pump was due to its particular implantation site with the lower extent of the device at or below the level of the linea semilunaris. Below this line, the aponeuroses of all 3 lateral abdominal muscles pass in front of the rectus muscle, leaving only the transversal fascia underneath the rectus, which is not a solid layer. Not considering this anatomical detail may facilitate the inward migration of implanted material.
CONCLUSION: When creating a pocket for subfascial implantation, a high subcostal incision should be used so that the lower extent of the pocket will still be above the level of the linea semilunaris, hence ensuring a strong fascial layer between the pump and the peritoneum.