MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.051

Медицинская библиотека · JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2017

Clinical Outcomes Following Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of 31 Studies and 17,882 Patients.

Buccheri Sergio, Franchina Gabriele, Romano Sara, Puglisi Sebastiano, Venuti Giuseppe, D'Arrigo Paolo, Francaviglia Bruno, Scalia Matteo, Condorelli Antonio, Barbanti Marco, Capranzano Piera, Tamburino Corrado, Capodanno Davide

СтатьяСистематический обзорNetwork Meta-AnalysisПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to explore the comparative clinical efficacy of different imaging modalities for guiding percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Coronary angiography (CA) is the standard imaging modality for intraprocedural guidance of PCI. Intracoronary imaging techniques, including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), can overcome some limitations of CA.

METHODS

Comprehensive hierarchical Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and adjusted observational studies comparing clinical outcomes of PCI with stent implantation guided by CA, IVUS, or OCT.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies encompassing 17,882 patients were included. Compared with CA guidance, the risks of all-cause death (odds ratio [OR]: 0.74; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.58 to 0.98), myocardial infarction (OR: 0.72; 95% CrI: 0.52 to 0.93), target lesion revascularization (OR: 0.74, 95% CrI: 0.58 to 0.90) and stent thrombosis (OR: 0.42; 95% CrI: 0.20 to 0.72) were significantly reduced by IVUS guidance. PCI guidance using either IVUS or OCT was associated with a significant reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR: 0.79; 95% CrI: 0.67 to 0.91 and OR: 0.68; 95% CrI: 0.49 to 0.97, respectively) and cardiovascular death (OR: 0.47; 95% CrI: 0.32 to 0.66 and OR: 0.31; 95% CrI: 0.13 to 0.66, respectively). No differences in terms of comparative clinical efficacy were found between IVUS and OCT for all the investigated outcomes. Pooled estimates were consistent across several sensitivity analyses. However, the treatment effect of IVUS on all-cause death was neutralized in the analysis restricted to randomized clinical trials (OR: 1.03; 95% CrI: 0.41 to 2.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CA, the use of intravascular imaging techniques for PCI guidance reduces the risk of cardiovascular death and adverse events.

Для цитирования: Buccheri Sergio, Franchina Gabriele, Romano Sara, Puglisi Sebastiano, Venuti Giuseppe, D'Arrigo Paolo, Francaviglia Bruno, Scalia Matteo, Condorelli Antonio, Barbanti Marco, Capranzano Piera, Tamburino Corrado, Capodanno Davide. Clinical Outcomes Following Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of 31 Studies and 17,882 Patients.. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.051.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.