MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-0037-1607060

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of knee surgery · 2017

Patient Factors Associated with Failure of Flap Coverage Used during Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Gad Bishoy V, Styron Joseph F, Goergy Mark A, Klika Alison K, Barsoum Wael K, Higuera Carlos A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a challenging problem in the setting of soft tissue defects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients who underwent rTKA requiring flap coverage and determine patient factors that predisposed them to failure. Forty-three consecutive patients (mean follow-up, 46.5 months) who underwent rTKA requiring flap coverage were retrospectively reviewed between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010. Sixteen of 43 patients experienced failure requiring either flap revision (n = 2) or above the knee amputation (n = 14). Patients with heart failure (p = 0.008), cancer (p = 0.049), or infection with Klebsiella pneumoniae (p = 0.002) had greater rates of failure. Smoking (p = 0.287), diabetes (p = 0.631), and flap type (p = 0.634, p = 0.801) were not associated with increased failure. Mean survival was 46.4 months. Survival of patients with a history of cancer (34.3 months) was less (p = 0.033) than those without (49.2 months). Flap coverage in rTKA is a viable limb salvage option for patients with soft tissue defects; however, failure rates are much higher than in patients not requiring flap coverage.

Для цитирования: Gad Bishoy V, Styron Joseph F, Goergy Mark A, Klika Alison K, Barsoum Wael K, Higuera Carlos A. Patient Factors Associated with Failure of Flap Coverage Used during Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.. The journal of knee surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1607060.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.