DOI 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.07.009
Soft tissue injuries after direct laryngoscopy.
Аннотация
STUDY
OBJECTIVE
The study objective is to determine the incidence of oral soft tissue trauma during classic direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation and the risk factors associated with it.
DESIGN
This is a prospective observational study.
SETTING
The setting is at a ward.
PATIENTS: The patients are adults submitted to elective interventions in general surgery requiring tracheal intubation by classic direct laryngoscopy.
INTERVENTIONS: During 6 months, all patients were interviewed 12-24 hours before anesthesia and after surgery and underwent a detailed oral examination performed by an anesthesiology blind to anesthetic management details and preoperative patient care.
MEASUREMENTS: Evaluation of oral soft tissue injuries includes oral mucosa including the gums; the alveolar mucosa in the edentulous patient, palate, and the buccal mucosa; lips (mucosa and skin); and the tongue. Injury severity was assessed using the severity scale presented routinely in Portuguese legal medicine research: grade 0, no injuries had; grade 1, mild severity injuries; grade 2, medium severity injuries; and grade 3, major severity injuries.
MAIN
RESULTS
Soft tissue trauma was observed in 278 (52.1%) patients. Soft tissue injury occurred once in 204 (38.2%) patients, 2 in 64 (38.2%) patients, and 3 times in 10 (1.9%) patients. Tongue injury was the most common type of soft tissue trauma (36.3%) followed by lower lip injury (22.3%), upper lip injury (7.1%), and oral mucosa injury (2.1%). All the lesions were grade 1 or 2. Only oral mucosa injury was found to be associated with age group (P = .021).
CONCLUSIONS
Our study reveals a high incidence of lesions grade 1 or 2 in soft tissue.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.