MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.10.002

Медицинская библиотека · Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2014

Head and neck, oral, and oropharyngeal cancer: a review of medicolegal cases.

Epstein Joel B, Kish Robert V, Hallajian Lucy, Sciubba James

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose was to review cases of malpractice in head and neck cancer (HNC) in order to examine allegations and outcomes of the litigation and to assess the implications for best practices in the clinical care of patients with HNC.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Three U.S. legal databases were accessed to assess the basis of the cases and the outcomes reported.

RESULTS

Dental and medical health care providers are identified in cases with alleged failure to diagnose or delayed diagnosis. In addition, inadequate prevention and management of oral complications of cancer therapy also may result in medicolegal action. In the dental cases, the mean recovery was $1,033,500.11, and in medical cases, it was $2,828,639.20.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to failure in the diagnosis of malignant disease, our review identified failure to properly prevent and manage oral complications as potential causes of medicolegal actions. Evidence-based care with a multidisciplinary team may promote diagnosis of disease and prevention and management of complications.

Для цитирования: Epstein Joel B, Kish Robert V, Hallajian Lucy, Sciubba James. Head and neck, oral, and oropharyngeal cancer: a review of medicolegal cases.. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.10.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.