Comparing clinical success and procedural difficulty between treatment-naïve and treatment-refractory patients with esophageal motility disorders during peroral endoscopic myotomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) can successfully treat patients with achalasia. Prior therapy with Botox (Allergan, Madison, NJ, USA) injections, pneumatic dilation (PD), and/or laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) is believed to increase the difficulty of POEM procedures. We aimed to determine if prior treatment methods were associated with longer procedure times or lower clinical success.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, consecutive patients who underwent POEM for achalasia between February 2017 and September 2021 were studied. Collected data were patient demographics, prior treatment, pre- and postprocedure Eckardt score (ES), distensibility indices (DIs), and procedure times. Primary outcomes were clinical success and procedure difficulty.

RESULTS

Of 95 patients (mean age, 55.6 years; 45% women), 25 patients underwent POEM for type I achalasia, 31 for type II achalasia, and 33 for spastic esophageal pathologies. Thirty-three patients (34.7%) were treated for achalasia before POEM with onabotulinumtoxinA injections (n = 18), PD (n = 17), and LHM (n = 3). There were no significant differences in post-treatment ESs or technical success between the 2 groups (P = .98 and P = .66, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that prior treatment was associated with decreased case time and easier tunneling during POEM.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior treatment did not impact the clinical success rate of POEM and led to decreased case times and easier tunneling difficulty, likely because of persistent lower esophageal sphincter changes and differences in diagnostic indications. POEM should be considered for patients with treatment-refractory symptoms as a safe and feasible option. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate our findings.