Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
Phosphorus enrichment does not enlarge the predicted CO2 fertilization effect on forest carbon sequestration.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Bin, Lyu He, Zhang Xueqian, Jiang Mingkai, Medlyn Belinda E, Wårlind David, Knauer Jürgen, Fleischer Katrin, Goll Daniel S, Olin Stefan, Yang Xiaojuan, Yu Lin, Zaehle Sönke, Zhang Haicheng, Schufft Kristian, Crous Kristine Y, Carrillo Yolima, Macdonald Catriona A, Anderson Ian C, Boer Matthias M, Farrell Mark, Gherlenda Andrew, Castañeda-Gómez Laura, Hasegawa Shun, Jarosch Klaus, Milham Paul, Ochoa-Hueso Raúl, Pathare Varsha, Pihlblad Johanna, Piñeiro Juan, Power Sally A, Reich Peter B, Riegler Markus, Ellsworth David S, Smith Benjamin
Аннотация
The capacity of nutrient-limited forests to enhance carbon (C) sequestration under elevated CO2 (eCO2) remains a critical uncertainty in C cycle modeling. While existing evidence suggests that low phosphorus (P) bioavailability may constrain CO2 fertilization effects on plant growth, the extent to which this limitation modulates ecosystem responses to eCO2 in forests adapted to P-deficient soils remains poorly understood. Here, using eight P-enabled models, we simulated the magnitudes and mechanisms through which P bioavailability interacts with eCO2, emulating an ecosystem-scale P enrichment experiment at a P-limited Eucalyptus forest undergoing long-term Free-Air CO2 Enrichment. While models predicted pronounced P effects on tree growth, P enrichment unexpectedly did not increase the CO2 effects on tree growth and ecosystem C sequestration. Models prioritized either CO2-driven or P-driven growth, but rarely both. This tradeoff emerged due to model-specific assumptions on 1) partitioning of the extra P in soil labile versus nonlabile pools; 2) plant photosynthetic acclimation to P deficiency; 3) C and nutrient use strategies regulating plant size and allocation; and 4) microbial-driven soil decomposition processes. By generating divergent yet biologically plausible outcomes, these predictions establish critical testable hypotheses for empirical research and highlight multiple P-related pathways that may influence the future land C sink.