Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP · 2026
Salivary assessment of X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1 (XRCC1) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) as biomarkers of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair response and hypoxia in oral submucous fibrosis: An observational study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Arora Sakshi, Joshi Jaya, Patil Rutuja, Chaure Arushi, Pusame Astha, Subhash Nimisha
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the levels of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair under the hypoxic conditions of oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) using X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1 (XRCC1) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) in saliva samples.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, India. A total of 45 participants were divided into three groups that is, controls without any history of gutkha use, gutka chewers without oral lesions, and gutka chewers with OSMF. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test was performed to measure the expression of XRCC1 and HIF-1α in saliva samples.
RESULTS: Salivary XRCC1 levels were significantly higher in gutkha chewers without oral lesions compared to controls and OSMF patients (P = .023). Similarly, salivary HIF-1α levels were also significantly elevated in gutkha chewers without oral lesions compared to both controls and OSMF patients (P = .028). In addition, post hoc analysis confirmed that gutkha chewers without oral lesions and the two other participant groups differed significantly for both biomarkers. However, a statistically nonsignificant correlation was found between XRCC1 and HIF-1α.
CONCLUSION: The findings showed higher expression of XRCC1 and HIF-1α in gutkha chewers without lesions, indicating that early stress-induced DNA damage and hypoxia may activate cellular DNA repair machinery and the release of protective transcription factors as an adaptive response. However, the finding of down-regulation in OSMF suggests depletion of repair proteins and cellular tolerance to the damage that occurs with persistent stress exposure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, India. A total of 45 participants were divided into three groups that is, controls without any history of gutkha use, gutka chewers without oral lesions, and gutka chewers with OSMF. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test was performed to measure the expression of XRCC1 and HIF-1α in saliva samples.
RESULTS: Salivary XRCC1 levels were significantly higher in gutkha chewers without oral lesions compared to controls and OSMF patients (P = .023). Similarly, salivary HIF-1α levels were also significantly elevated in gutkha chewers without oral lesions compared to both controls and OSMF patients (P = .028). In addition, post hoc analysis confirmed that gutkha chewers without oral lesions and the two other participant groups differed significantly for both biomarkers. However, a statistically nonsignificant correlation was found between XRCC1 and HIF-1α.
CONCLUSION: The findings showed higher expression of XRCC1 and HIF-1α in gutkha chewers without lesions, indicating that early stress-induced DNA damage and hypoxia may activate cellular DNA repair machinery and the release of protective transcription factors as an adaptive response. However, the finding of down-regulation in OSMF suggests depletion of repair proteins and cellular tolerance to the damage that occurs with persistent stress exposure.