MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology · 2016

[Retrospective Risk Factor Analysis of Spinal Cord Ischemia after Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair].

Kayama Satoru, Mita Norikatsu, Takahashi Toshikazu, Kagaya Shin, Miyoshi Sotaro

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair carries a risk of spinal cord ischemia(SCI), similar to open repair. We conducted a retrospective study of the incidence and outcome of SCI after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

From March 2007 to September 2012, 96 patients underwent TEVAR at Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center. A loss of lower extremity motor evoked potentials (MEP) or lower extremity strength was treated emergently to maintain a mean arterial blood pressure ≥ 70-80 mmHg. For the protection of spinal cord, combined use of naloxone and cerebrospinal fluid drainage (≤ 13 mmHg) was employed.

RESULTS

4 (4.2%) of the 96 patients had paraplegia. One had lower extremity strength loss after extubation and 3 developed delayed-onset paraparesis/paraplegia. Afterward 2 (50%) of them were dead. SCI patients were more likely to be elderly (78 ± 5.5 vs 70 ± 7.1 years; P = 0.0476). A trend toward an increase in SCI was noted in women (25.0% vs 2.2%; P = 0.0338), and in length of aortic coverage (25.9 ± 2.6 cm vs 16.2 ± 5.6 cm; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Early detection and intervention to improve spinal cord perfusion may benefit patients at risk for SCI.

Для цитирования: Kayama Satoru, Mita Norikatsu, Takahashi Toshikazu, Kagaya Shin, Miyoshi Sotaro. [Retrospective Risk Factor Analysis of Spinal Cord Ischemia after Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair].. Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology. 2016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.