MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/sc.2016.4

Медицинская библиотека · Spinal cord · 2016

The influence of regular physical activity on lung function in paraplegic people.

Montesinos-Magraner L, López-Bueno L, Gómez-Garrido A, Gomis M, González L M, García-Massó X, Serra-Añó P

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES

The main goal of this study was to examine the influence of regular physical activity (PA) on lung volumes and flows.

SETTING

The study was conducted in the Vall d'Hebrón Hospital, Barcelona (Spain), and La Fe Hospital, Valencia (Spain).

METHODS

Spirometric tests were performed to 67 paraplegics, and differences were established between the active group (AG) (n=37) that performed >60 min per week of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and 30 non-AG (NAG). Further, we established the relationship between the spirometric and PA variables and between being active and reaching the lower limit of normal (LLN) of the spirometric variables.

RESULTS

AG had greater values than the NAG: FVC (P<0.01), FEV1 (P<0.01) and PEF (P<0.01). Moderate correlations between the MVPA and FVC (r=0.41, P<0.01) and the MVPA and FEV1 (r=0.39, P<0.01) were obtained. The relationship between being physically active and reaching the LLN was statistically significant for FEV1 (χ2=6.184, P<0.05) but not for FVC (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of MVPA for a minimum of 60 min per week can have a beneficial effect, both on lung volumes and on expiratory flow, and led to an achievement of the LLN in FEV1.

Для цитирования: Montesinos-Magraner L, López-Bueno L, Gómez-Garrido A, Gomis M, González L M, García-Massó X, Serra-Añó P. The influence of regular physical activity on lung function in paraplegic people.. Spinal cord. 2016. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2016.4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.