MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/147323001204000432

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of international medical research · 2012

Optimal bent length of lightwand for intubation in adults: a randomized, prospective, comparative study.

Chen J, Luo W, Wang E, Lu K

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect on intubation success of different bent lengths of a lightwand (a malleable illuminating stylet used for intubation), based on the patient's thyroid prominence-to-mandibular angle distance (TMD), thyroid prominence-to-incisor distance (TID) and gender.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, blinded study included patients undergoing elective surgery. In group A, the bent length was determined based on the patient's gender. In groups B and C, the bent length was calculated according to the patient's TMD or TID, respectively. Intubation success rate, time required for intubation, haemodynamics and complications postintubation were documented.

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to one of the study groups. There were no significant differences in number of intubation attempts and success rate among the three groups. The mean time required for intubation was significantly shorter in group A than in the other groups. There were no major complications in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

Gender-determined bent length was more suitable for lightwand-guided intubation than TID or TMD. For most patients, the optimal bent length was in the range of 6.0-6.9 cm.

Для цитирования: Chen J, Luo W, Wang E, Lu K. Optimal bent length of lightwand for intubation in adults: a randomized, prospective, comparative study.. The Journal of international medical research. 2012. DOI: 10.1177/147323001204000432.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.