Frontiers in surgery · 2025
Impact of anatomical factors on surgical planning and outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing prophylactic mastectomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Maciulaitis Tomas, Gudavicienė Daiva, Jakutis Nerijus
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate implant-based reconstruction is widely accepted and effective prophylactic surgical approach for women with high-risk of hereditary BC. However, anatomical factors-advanced breast ptosis and increased sternal notch-to-nipple (SN-N) distance-can increase technical difficulty and complication risk. Preshaping procedures may optimize anatomy and broaden NSM eligibility. This study evaluates the role of preshaping in facilitating safe NSM with implant-based reconstruction.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 84 patients who underwent prophylactic mastectomy at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos between 2018 and 2024. All had confirmed pathogenic mutations associated with hereditary BC risk. At the time of analysis, 76 patients had completed mastectomy, while 8 had undergone only the preshaping procedure. Patients were divided into two cohorts: single-stage NSM with direct-to-implant reconstruction, and a two-stage approach involving initial preshaping surgery followed by delayed NSM. Anatomical features, surgical timing, complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: Among 76 patients, 63.2% underwent single-stage and 36.8% two-stage reconstruction. Two-stage patients had significantly greater SN-N distances (26.4 ± 3.1 cm vs. 21.6 ± 3.2 cm, p < 0.001). The overall complication rate was 7.9%, higher in the single-stage group (10.4%) than the two-stage group (3.6%). In the single-stage cohort, complications correlated with higher ptosis grades (p = 0.0021). Ductal carcinoma in situ was found in one patient from each group.
CONCLUSIONS: Preshaping surgery effectively optimizes anatomy for NSM, reducing complications in patients with ptosis or extended SN-N distances. The two-stage approach offers safe and favorable outcomes in anatomically challenging cases.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 84 patients who underwent prophylactic mastectomy at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos between 2018 and 2024. All had confirmed pathogenic mutations associated with hereditary BC risk. At the time of analysis, 76 patients had completed mastectomy, while 8 had undergone only the preshaping procedure. Patients were divided into two cohorts: single-stage NSM with direct-to-implant reconstruction, and a two-stage approach involving initial preshaping surgery followed by delayed NSM. Anatomical features, surgical timing, complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: Among 76 patients, 63.2% underwent single-stage and 36.8% two-stage reconstruction. Two-stage patients had significantly greater SN-N distances (26.4 ± 3.1 cm vs. 21.6 ± 3.2 cm, p < 0.001). The overall complication rate was 7.9%, higher in the single-stage group (10.4%) than the two-stage group (3.6%). In the single-stage cohort, complications correlated with higher ptosis grades (p = 0.0021). Ductal carcinoma in situ was found in one patient from each group.
CONCLUSIONS: Preshaping surgery effectively optimizes anatomy for NSM, reducing complications in patients with ptosis or extended SN-N distances. The two-stage approach offers safe and favorable outcomes in anatomically challenging cases.