MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5152/tpd.2013.07

Медицинская библиотека · Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi · 2013

[Evaluation of materials sent due to suspected cystic echinococcosis to the parasitology laboratory of Ondokuz Mayıs University Medical School between the Years 2005-2011].

Karadağ Adil, Yanık Keramettin, Ünal Nevzat, Odabaşı Hakan, Hökelek Murat

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is an important health problem common in our country. In this study, anti-Echinococcus granulosus IgG antibodies were investigated in the serum samples of 454 patients who attended the Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Parasitology between 2005 and 2011.

METHODS

IHA (Fumouze, France) and ELISA (R-Biopharm, Germany) tests were performed at the same time.

RESULTS

While serum samples from 328 patients (72%) were negative with both tests, 81 samples (18%) were found to be positive with both tests. Forty (49%) cases were female, 41 (51%) cases were male who were positive by both tests. 25 (31%) positive cases were between 31 and 50 years old. While IHA was negative for 33 patients (7%) ELISA was positive for the same samples. In 2 patients (0.4%), both tests revealed low-positivity.

CONCLUSION

Using these two tests together for serologic detection of cystic echinococcosis could be recommended because of the high sensitivity and specificity ratios.

Для цитирования: Karadağ Adil, Yanık Keramettin, Ünal Nevzat, Odabaşı Hakan, Hökelek Murat. [Evaluation of materials sent due to suspected cystic echinococcosis to the parasitology laboratory of Ondokuz Mayıs University Medical School between the Years 2005-2011].. Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi. 2013. DOI: 10.5152/tpd.2013.07.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.