MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1756285615610471

Медицинская библиотека · Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2016

A comparison between plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin in children with Guillain-Barré syndrome in Upper Egypt.

Saad Khaled, Mohamad Ismail L, Abd El-Hamed Mohamed A, Tawfeek Mostafa S K, Ahmed Ahmed E, Abdel Baseer Khaled A, El-Shemy Ahmed S, El-Houfey Amira A, Tamer Diaa M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study is to assess the clinico-electrophysiological profile of children with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in Upper Egypt and to compare the efficacy of plasmapheresis versus other treatment modalities.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of children from January 2010 to October 2014 diagnosed as GBS. It included 62 cases.

RESULTS

Acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP) was the most prevalent type of GBS in our locality. As regards the treatment, 32 cases received plasmapheresis while 30 patients received intravenous immunoglobulin. We found a significant decrease in the duration of hospitalization and a significant increase in the number of children with complete recovery in cases treated with plasmapheresis.

CONCLUSION

GBS is not uncommon in children of Upper Egypt, with AIDP the most prevalent type. Plasmapheresis is the best treatment modalities for GBS as it reduces the duration of hospital stay and hastens the recovery of those children.

Для цитирования: Saad Khaled, Mohamad Ismail L, Abd El-Hamed Mohamed A, Tawfeek Mostafa S K, Ahmed Ahmed E, Abdel Baseer Khaled A, El-Shemy Ahmed S, El-Houfey Amira A, Tamer Diaa M. A comparison between plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin in children with Guillain-Barré syndrome in Upper Egypt.. Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1756285615610471.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.