MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3870

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with communicating accessory hepatic duct injury and management: A case report.

Zhao Peng-Ju, Ma Yan, Yang Ji-Wu

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the gold standard for the treatment of patients with gallstones. However, bile duct injury is one of the most serious complications of this surgery, with an incidence rate of 0.3%-0.7%. Variations in anatomical structures are one of the main reasons for such injuries.

CASE SUMMARY: We report a 26-year-old male patient who presented with repeated upper abdominal pain for 1 year. Ultrasound examination and blood tests indicated gallstones accompanied by chronic cholecystitis. The patient underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. During the surgery, a communicating bile duct connecting the gallbladder neck and the right hepatic duct was discovered and injured. Meticulous dissection identified it as a communicating accessory hepatic duct, which was then definitively ligated. Postoperatively, the patient recovered well, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography showed no intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile duct strictures. The pathology report showed chronic cholecystitis with gallstones.

CONCLUSION

Carefully manage communicating accessory bile ducts in cholecystectomy using cholangiography or meticulous separation, followed by ligation is effective.

Для цитирования: Zhao Peng-Ju, Ma Yan, Yang Ji-Wu. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with communicating accessory hepatic duct injury and management: A case report.. World journal of gastrointestinal surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3870.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.