MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.26969

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2021

Postparotidectomy sialocele: 6-year review of underlying factors.

Kinberg Eliezer C, Garneau Jonathan C, Eljazzar Rachelle, Genden Eric M, Teng Marita S, Miles Brett A, Rosenberg Joshua, Lawson William, Yao Mike

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Postparotidectomy sialocele is a frustrating challenge. Published rates of postparotidectomy fluid collections range from 6% to 39%. We report our experience of 398 parotidectomies performed over a 6-year period.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of parotidectomies performed over a 6-year period was completed. Drain placement, smoking status, tumor size, and postoperative utilization of scopolamine were analyzed. Binary logistical regression and odds ratio calculations were performed.

RESULTS

Postparotidectomy sialocele occurred in 25% of patients. Neither suction drain placement nor usage of immediate postoperative scopolamine (in a 22-patient subset) prevented sialocele formation. Smoking status also did not correlate. Increasing resection size was linearly correlated with the risk of sialocele.

CONCLUSION

Drain placement and smoking status do not correlate with sialocele prevention after parotidectomy. Sialocele formation directly correlates with the resection size. These data may guide preoperative counseling; however, additional work is necessary to identify effective prevention mechanisms for postparotidectomy sialocele.

Для цитирования: Kinberg Eliezer C, Garneau Jonathan C, Eljazzar Rachelle, Genden Eric M, Teng Marita S, Miles Brett A, Rosenberg Joshua, Lawson William, Yao Mike. Postparotidectomy sialocele: 6-year review of underlying factors.. Head & neck. 2021. DOI: 10.1002/hed.26969.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.