Single-centre first experience with transapical transcatheter mitral valve replacement with an apical tether: factors influencing screening outcomes.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Transcatheter mitral valve replacement has recently been introduced as an alternative treatment option for severe mitral regurgitation. We present our single-centre first experience with screening and implantation outcomes.
METHODS
Twenty-five patients with mitral regurgitation grades 3 and 4 were screened based on study inclusion/exclusion criteria, echocardiography and computed tomography imaging. All patients were evaluated by the centre's Heart Team, followed by the Tendyne's internal screening process. Patients who failed the screening criteria were considered for alternative treatments.
RESULTS
Of the 25 patients screened for transcatheter mitral valve replacement, 14 patients failed screening and 11 patients passed. The patients who failed screening were more often older, were women and were smaller in stature than those who passed screening. The main reason for patients to fail screening changed during the study from large annular dimensions to a small predicted neo-left ventricular outflow tract. Eight of the 11 patients who passed screening were treated using the Tendyne device, and 3 patients required alternate treatments due to urgency including 1 MitraClip procedure and 2 surgical repairs. Of the 14 patients who failed the screening, 5 patients had open surgery (4 patients received mitral valve repair and 1 mitral valve replacement). All 8 patients who underwent the Tendyne procedure were successfully treated without mortality during the observation time.
CONCLUSIONS
Transcatheter mitral valve replacement is an effective and safe treatment for well-selected patients with symptomatic mitral regurgitation. For patients who fail the screening process, the MitraClip procedure or open surgical valve repair are feasible.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.