The ratio of measured and reference effective orifice areas for discriminating prosthetic aortic valve obstruction.

AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the measured effective orifice area (EOA)/reference EOA ratio in discriminating mechanical prosthetic aortic valve (PAV) obstruction.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

This is a retrospective study of 193 mechanical PAV patients with an elevated mean transprosthetic pressure gradient (PG) over 20 mmHg or peak velocity over 3 m/s. Of those, 143 patients were objectively proven PAV obstruction with cardiac computed tomography or surgical inspection. The EOA was measured using the continuity equation, and the reference EOA values were obtained from previous guidelines. The measured/reference EOA ratio was significantly lower in the obstruction group (0.63 ± 0.18 vs. 0.86 ± 0.17; P < 0.001). The EOA ratio added incremental value for discriminating obstruction from the conventional parameters recommended in the guidelines. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the measured/reference EOA ratio discriminated PAV obstruction from those without obstruction [area under the curve (AUC), 0.840; 95% confidence interval, 0.783-0.898; P < 0.001]. A cutoff of 0.71 had 73.4% sensitivity and 82.0% specificity. The novel diagnostic algorithm adding the EOA ratio had similar accuracy to previous guideline algorithms, including reference EOA, and conventional Doppler parameters (AUC, 0.763 vs. 0.731; P = 0.309). In patients with a large PAV (≥23 mm), the novel algorithm had higher accuracy than the previous algorithm (AUC, 0.788 vs. 0.642; P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

The ratio of measured/reference EOA adds incremental value over conventional Doppler parameters and might be helpful for distinguishing PAV obstruction.