Difficulties in the use of electrocardiographic criteria for the differential diagnosis of left bundle branch block pattern tachycardia in patients with a structurally normal heart.

In patients with left bundle branch block pattern tachycardia, electrocardiographic criteria, based on leads V1, V2 and V6, have been shown to be effective for the diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia in patients with a previous myocardial infarct. To test these criteria on a wider population, we studied 53 consecutive patients with left bundle branch block pattern tachycardia. Seventeen patients had supraventricular tachycardia and 36 had ventricular tachycardia, 18 with a previous myocardial infarction, two with cardiomyopathy, and 16 with a normal heart. The sensitivity for the diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia in patients with a previous myocardial infarct of the combined criteria was 100% but was only 50% for the other patients, which was not significantly different from the patients with supraventricular tachycardia (29%). Two other criteria, right axis shift in tachycardia and ventricular ectopics during sinus rhythm with the same morphology as the tachycardia, were only seen in patients with ventricular tachycardia, and combined with the other criteria allowed the correct identification of 35/36 patients with ventricular tachycardia. To conclude, the electrocardiographic criteria based on leads V1, V2 and V6 are not sensitive for the diagnosis of a ventricular origin of left bundle branch block pattern tachycardia in patients with a normal heart and additional criteria are required for the diagnosis in these patients.