MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/lary.70232

Медицинская библиотека · The Laryngoscope · 2025

Malleostapedotomy in Patients With Stapes Fixation: A Systematic Review.

Alicandri-Ciufelli Matteo, D'Alessandro Edoardo, Lucidi Daniela, Nocini Riccardo, Qiu Hui Davide

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature regarding malleostapedotomy as primary or revision surgery in patients with stapes fixation, to point out the state of the art regarding indications, techniques and outcomes of this procedure.

DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were screened following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

REVIEW

METHODS

Clinical studies describing malleostapedotomy in patients with stapes fixation were included in this Systematic Review. Data about indications, intraoperative findings, features of the prostheses and audiological results were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 25 articles and 632 ears that underwent malleostapedotomy were included in the analysis. This technique has been employed for both primary and revision surgeries, evolving over time alongside advancements in the prostheses used. Revision otosclerosis surgery was identified as the most common surgery necessitating malleostapedotomy. Among the cases, 44.8% achieved ABG closure within 10 dB, while 84.9% achieved ABG closure within 20 dB.

CONCLUSIONS

Malleostapedotomy is a safe and valid surgical technique that can be performed when incus anchoring stapedoplasty is not feasible.

Для цитирования: Alicandri-Ciufelli Matteo, D'Alessandro Edoardo, Lucidi Daniela, Nocini Riccardo, Qiu Hui Davide. Malleostapedotomy in Patients With Stapes Fixation: A Systematic Review.. The Laryngoscope. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/lary.70232.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.