Diagnostic Performance of Radiomics for Differentiating Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma from Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

Differentiating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is essential for selecting the most effective treatment strategies. However, traditional imaging modalities and serum biomarkers often lack sufficient specificity. Radiomics, a sophisticated image analysis approach that derives quantitative data from medical imaging, has emerged as a promising non-invasive tool.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and meta-analyze the radiomics diagnostic accuracy in differentiating ICC from HCC.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched through January 24, 2025. Studies evaluating radiomics models for distinguishing ICC from HCC were included. Assessing the quality of included studies was done by using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) and METhodological RadiomICs Score tools. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Subgroup and publication bias analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

12 studies with 2541 patients were included, with 14 validation cohorts entered into meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of radiomics models were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.93), respectively, with an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91). Subgroup analyses revealed variations based on segmentation method, software used, and sample size, though not all differences were statistically significant. Publication bias was not detected.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing ICC from HCC and offers a non-invasive adjunct to conventional diagnostics. Further prospective, multicenter studies with standardized workflows are needed to enhance clinical applicability and reproducibility.