Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2022
Rupture of an adjacent cerebral aneurysm following the deployment of a Pipeline embolization device: illustrative case.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakayashiki Atsushi, Sakata Hiroyuki, Ezura Masayuki, Endo Hidenori, Inoue Takashi, Saito Atsushi, Tominaga Teiji
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although the Pipeline embolization device (PED) is effective for intracranial aneurysm treatment, its impact on the surrounding vascular structure is unknown.
OBSERVATIONS: A 71-year-old woman was incidentally found to have a simultaneous large posterior communicating artery aneurysm and an ipsilateral small anterior choroidal artery aneurysm. She underwent flow diversion therapy for both aneurysms with a PED, but the distal shortening of the PED after deployment led to the exposure of the anterior choroidal artery aneurysm. Follow-up angiography revealed complete obliteration of the posterior communicating artery aneurysm, but the anterior choroidal artery aneurysm remained. Three years after the endovascular surgery, the patient experienced a subarachnoid hemorrhage due to the rupture of the anterior choroidal artery aneurysm. Retrospective analysis of angiographic images revealed a change in the vascular geometry surrounding the ruptured aneurysm after PED deployment; this was further accompanied by an increase in the flow velocity inside the aneurysm.
LESSONS: Because PED use might induce the adverse effects on the adjacent uncovered aneurysm by changing the vascular geometry and hemodynamic stress, a cautious therapeutic strategy, such as proper placement of the stent and using a longer and appropriate-sized PED, should be chosen when deploying the PED.
OBSERVATIONS: A 71-year-old woman was incidentally found to have a simultaneous large posterior communicating artery aneurysm and an ipsilateral small anterior choroidal artery aneurysm. She underwent flow diversion therapy for both aneurysms with a PED, but the distal shortening of the PED after deployment led to the exposure of the anterior choroidal artery aneurysm. Follow-up angiography revealed complete obliteration of the posterior communicating artery aneurysm, but the anterior choroidal artery aneurysm remained. Three years after the endovascular surgery, the patient experienced a subarachnoid hemorrhage due to the rupture of the anterior choroidal artery aneurysm. Retrospective analysis of angiographic images revealed a change in the vascular geometry surrounding the ruptured aneurysm after PED deployment; this was further accompanied by an increase in the flow velocity inside the aneurysm.
LESSONS: Because PED use might induce the adverse effects on the adjacent uncovered aneurysm by changing the vascular geometry and hemodynamic stress, a cautious therapeutic strategy, such as proper placement of the stent and using a longer and appropriate-sized PED, should be chosen when deploying the PED.