MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1684/epd.2017.0916

Медицинская библиотека · Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2017

Epilepsy after cerebral infection: review of the literature and the potential for surgery.

Ramantani Georgia, Holthausen Hans

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The risk of unprovoked seizures in population-based cohorts of cerebral infection survivors is 7-8% in developed countries, rising to considerably higher rates in resource-poor countries. The main risk factors for epilepsy after cerebral infection, besides acute seizures, are infection-associated brain lesions and status epilepticus during the acute phase. Despite the high prevalence of pharmacoresistant epilepsies after cerebral infections, especially in patients with MRI-identifiable lesions, only a small minority undergoes epilepsy surgery. However, excellent surgical candidates are particularly those with a history of meningitis or encephalitis in early childhood, hippocampal sclerosis on MRI, as well as a history, seizure semiology, and EEG-findings compatible with the diagnosis of a mesial temporal lobe epilepsy syndrome. More challenging are patients with neocortical/extratemporal lobe epilepsies post cerebral infection. Finally, patients with a severe hemispheric injury with contralateral hemiparesis are candidates for hemispherectomy/hemispherotomy. This review attempts to shed some light on this frequent cause of symptomatic focal epilepsy, with an emphasis on the chances offered by epilepsy surgery.

Для цитирования: Ramantani Georgia, Holthausen Hans. Epilepsy after cerebral infection: review of the literature and the potential for surgery.. Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape. 2017. DOI: 10.1684/epd.2017.0916.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.