Integrating prior decompensation into ACLF definition to enhance clinical management.

BACKGROUND

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a complicated syndrome associated with high short-term mortality and reversibility. Whether the prior decompensation should be included in the definition of ACLF is controversial.

METHODS

A total of 532 patients with decompensation (prior or first) of chronic liver disease were retrospectively enrolled and analyzed from January 2018 to June 2023. Clinical data were used to identify the characteristics and determine prognosis.

RESULTS

Of the 532 patients, 99 patients did not meet APASL-ACLF criteria due to the existence of prior decompensation and 433 patients met the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL)-ACLF criteria. The two groups had similar characteristics including prognosis scores (Chinese Group on the Study of Severe Hepatitis B (COSSH)-ACLF II score: 7.59 vs. 7.67, p = 0.934; Chronic Liver Failure (CLIF) Consortium ACLF score: 42.90 vs. 44.81, p = 0.273), the distribution of patients with APASL ACLF research consortium score (AARC score) (5-7: 19.2%/12.0%; 8-10: 56.6%/55.0%; 11-15: 24.2%/33.0%, p > 0.05) and the 28-/90-day mortality rates (30.5%/43.2% vs. 36.3%/43.1%, p = 0.267/0.978). In all integrated ACLF patients, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that COSSH-ACLF IIs had higher prognostic efficiency and clinical net benefit than AARC score and CLIF-C ACLFs for 28-/90-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

Prior decompensated patients exhibited clinical characteristics and high short-term mortality similar to those of first decompensated patients. The COSSH-ACLF IIs demonstrated the highest prognostic efficiency for all integrated ACLF patients. Including prior decompensation in the ACLF definition can help to simplify and improve clinical management.