MedElevator
Войти в исследования European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2026
Impact of Transcatheter or Surgical Mitral Repair on Arrhythmic Burden in Patients With Mitral Valve Prolapse.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sharew Betemariam, Sallam Aminah, Razavi Allen A, Nowacki Amy S, Blackstone Eugene, Emerson Dominic, Bowdish Michael E, Chikwe Joanna
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (AMVP) is associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias, yet the impact of surgical repair versus transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) on arrhythmic outcomes remains unclear. We evaluated ventricular arrhythmia occurrence and premature ventricular contraction (PVC) burden following mitral repair in patients with and without AMVP.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1911 patients who underwent surgical mitral valve repair or TEER between 2004 and 2024 at a single institution. AMVP was defined per EHRA/ESC criteria, requiring mitral valve prolapse with frequent (≥5% PVC burden) or complex ventricular arrhythmias and no alternative arrhythmic substrate. Outcomes included non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), ventricular tachycardia (VT), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation, mortality, and changes in PVC burden in patients with pre- and post-procedural rhythm monitoring.
RESULTS: Among 154 patients with AMVP, 109 (71%) underwent surgical repair and 45 (29%) underwent TEER. Following surgical repair, patients with AMVP had similar rates of NSVT (18% vs 13%), VT (3.7% vs 3.6%), and ICD implantation (3.7% vs 3.7%) compared with non-AMVP patients. In contrast, after TEER, patients with AMVP experienced significantly higher NSVT (33% vs 7%, P < 0.01), VT (12% vs 2.6%, P = 0.01), and ICD implantation (4.7% vs 0%, P = 0.02). PVC burden decreased after surgical repair (1.1% to 0.5%, P < 0.001) but remained unchanged after TEER. Mortality was higher in AMVP but not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical mitral repair is associated with reduced arrhythmic burden in AMVP, whereas TEER is associated with persistently elevated ventricular arrhythmias. These findings support phenotype-guided repair strategies and underscore the need for prospective studies comparing arrhythmic outcomes across repair modalities.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1911 patients who underwent surgical mitral valve repair or TEER between 2004 and 2024 at a single institution. AMVP was defined per EHRA/ESC criteria, requiring mitral valve prolapse with frequent (≥5% PVC burden) or complex ventricular arrhythmias and no alternative arrhythmic substrate. Outcomes included non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), ventricular tachycardia (VT), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation, mortality, and changes in PVC burden in patients with pre- and post-procedural rhythm monitoring.
RESULTS: Among 154 patients with AMVP, 109 (71%) underwent surgical repair and 45 (29%) underwent TEER. Following surgical repair, patients with AMVP had similar rates of NSVT (18% vs 13%), VT (3.7% vs 3.6%), and ICD implantation (3.7% vs 3.7%) compared with non-AMVP patients. In contrast, after TEER, patients with AMVP experienced significantly higher NSVT (33% vs 7%, P < 0.01), VT (12% vs 2.6%, P = 0.01), and ICD implantation (4.7% vs 0%, P = 0.02). PVC burden decreased after surgical repair (1.1% to 0.5%, P < 0.001) but remained unchanged after TEER. Mortality was higher in AMVP but not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical mitral repair is associated with reduced arrhythmic burden in AMVP, whereas TEER is associated with persistently elevated ventricular arrhythmias. These findings support phenotype-guided repair strategies and underscore the need for prospective studies comparing arrhythmic outcomes across repair modalities.