MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13028-015-0133-z

Медицинская библиотека · Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · 2015

Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in free-ranging wild boars hunted for human consumption in Estonia.

Jokelainen Pikka, Velström Kaisa, Lassen Brian

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Although the prevalence of human Toxoplasma gondii infections is high in Estonia, no information is available on the prevalence of infections in the local animal populations. Wild boars are a good indicator species for estimating the prevalence and spread of T. gondii and were thus investigated in this nationwide cross-sectional study. Volunteer hunters sampled cardiac or skeletal muscle of 471 wild boars legally hunted for human consumption in Estonia during the hunting season of 2012-2013. Serosanguineous meat juice samples were obtained from thawed tissue samples, diluted 1:40, and screened for specific anti-T. gondii IgG antibodies with a commercial direct agglutination test.

RESULTS

Almost one-quarter (113; 24%) of the wild boars examined were seropositive for T. gondii. The seroprevalence did not differ significantly between age groups or sexes. The seroprevalence was lowest in Viljandimaa, which is located in the southern part of Estonia. In other counties, the infection was evenly prevalent.

CONCLUSIONS

In Estonia, wild boars are commonly exposed to T. gondii, which is endemic and widespread. The consumption of raw or undercooked meat of Estonian wild boars may pose an infection risk to humans and other hosts.

Для цитирования: Jokelainen Pikka, Velström Kaisa, Lassen Brian. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in free-ranging wild boars hunted for human consumption in Estonia.. Acta veterinaria Scandinavica. 2015. DOI: 10.1186/s13028-015-0133-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.