MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia) · 2012

[The influence of posture during flower-cutting on the strength of flower-cutters' apprehension].

Maradei-García Maria F, Delgado-Gamboa Adriana C, Espinel-Correal Francisco

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Musculoskeletal disorders, particularly carpal tunnel syndrome, have been one of the most important public health problems during recent years. It is the leading cause of occupational morbidity in Colombia, the flower industry being one of the areas of work having the highest incidence. This study was thus aimed at ascertaining whether flower-cutters' strength of apprehension has been affected by cutting height and arm posture.

METHOD: The study involved 12 operating personnel; a 22 factorial arrangement was used and the effect of cutting height and posture on forearm pronation or supination ans the factors influencing the strength of apprehension.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis showed no interaction between the factors; however, it did reveal a significant effect on the strength of apprehension. Varying how the arm bent had a greater effect than changing the position of the forearm (pronation or supination).

CONCLUSIONS

Pronation was the ideal flower-cutting posture because it involved less effort to perform such task. Further research should examine the effects of wrist deviation angle in the flower industry.

Для цитирования: Maradei-García Maria F, Delgado-Gamboa Adriana C, Espinel-Correal Francisco. [The influence of posture during flower-cutting on the strength of flower-cutters' apprehension].. Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia). 2012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.