DOI 10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.04.005
[Epidemiological aspects and prognostic factors of severe traumatic brain injuries].
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To determine the severity factors in severe traumatic brain injuries.
METHODS
A prospective descriptive study of severe head injuries admitted to the emergency department at Ibn Tofail Hospital at the University Hospital of Marrakech over a period of six months from May to October 2015. The following data was collected: circumstances, clinical, biology, radiology, treatment and evolution.
RESULTS
One hundred and nineteen patients with severe traumatic brain injury were collected (101 males, 84,9%). The mean age was 37,73±15,7 years. Road accidents were the most common cause representing 84%. The median Glasgow coma scale (GCS) was 7±3. We noted 36 cases (30,3%) of anisocoria, 32 cases (26,9%) of bilateral mydriasis and 72 cases (60,5%) of hypoxia. Cerebral contusions (66,1%) and meningeal hemorrhage (66,6%) were the most frequent lesions on CT. Forty-seven patients (42%) had stage VI Marshall lesions. Twenty-four patients (20.1%) required a neurosurgical intervention, 12 extradural hematoma evacuations and 10 craniocerebral wounds. Mortality was 64.7% (77 deaths), the main cause was neurological (64,9%). In the latter group, we observed more frequently an older age (P=0.00001), a management delay (P=0.011), a low initial GCS (P=0.000001), a bilateral nonreactive mydriasis (P=0.0001), a hypoxia (P=0.0002), a subarachnoid hemorrhage (P=0.008), a high Marshall score (P=0.017) and an anemia (P=0.046).
CONCLUSION
Head trauma is a public health problem. The victims are young, and the sequelae are frequently disabling. Several parameters are associated with a poorer prognosis including age, neurological state and the initial delay in management.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.