Molecular and cellular probes · 2026
R-loops: Biological functions, regulatory mechanisms, and therapeutic implications in brain diseases-A review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sun Ruonan, Duan Xiaofei, Wang Xinyi, Liu Jiabin, Li Zhihui, Wang Yichao
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: R-loops are three-stranded nucleic acid structures formed by a DNA-RNA hybrid and a displaced single-stranded DNA. They regulate transcription, replication, and DNA repair, but their dysregulation causes genomic instability and inflammation, contributing to brain diseases. The nervous system exhibits selective vulnerability to R-loop stress due to ultra-long gene transcription, post-mitotic longevity, and high metabolic demands.
METHODS: This review synthesizes current literature from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase (2010-2026) on R-loop biology, with a focus on brain-specific mechanisms, regulatory factors (SETX, ZPR1, METTL3, TDP-43/FUS), and disease models.
RESULTS: In neurodegeneration, R-loop accumulation drives repeat expansion disorders (Fragile X, Huntington's disease) and loss-of-function SETX mutations (AOA2), whereas gain-of-function SETX (L389S) causes pathological R-loop depletion in ALS4, disrupting TGF-β signaling. TDP-43/FUS and SMN are integral to R-loop resolution, unifying ALS/FTD and SMA. In brain cancers, METTL3-mediated m6A modification of TERRA stabilizes telomeric R-loops in ALT-positive neuroblastoma, creating a therapeutic vulnerability to METTL3 inhibitors (STM2457, STC-15). Glioma stem cells rely on m6A-modified circPOLR2B to regulate R-loop formation and malignancy. Clinical-stage agents (EP102, TUG1ASO, ATX-559) and R-loop-derived prognostic signatures (RLPI) are emerging, but translation is hindered by a lack of non-invasive biomarkers and the dual physiological/pathological roles of R-loops.
CONCLUSIONS: R-loops are central to brain disease pathogenesis, offering promising therapeutic targets. Future research should prioritize precision R-loop modulators, non-invasive biomarkers, and combinatorial strategies.
METHODS: This review synthesizes current literature from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase (2010-2026) on R-loop biology, with a focus on brain-specific mechanisms, regulatory factors (SETX, ZPR1, METTL3, TDP-43/FUS), and disease models.
RESULTS: In neurodegeneration, R-loop accumulation drives repeat expansion disorders (Fragile X, Huntington's disease) and loss-of-function SETX mutations (AOA2), whereas gain-of-function SETX (L389S) causes pathological R-loop depletion in ALS4, disrupting TGF-β signaling. TDP-43/FUS and SMN are integral to R-loop resolution, unifying ALS/FTD and SMA. In brain cancers, METTL3-mediated m6A modification of TERRA stabilizes telomeric R-loops in ALT-positive neuroblastoma, creating a therapeutic vulnerability to METTL3 inhibitors (STM2457, STC-15). Glioma stem cells rely on m6A-modified circPOLR2B to regulate R-loop formation and malignancy. Clinical-stage agents (EP102, TUG1ASO, ATX-559) and R-loop-derived prognostic signatures (RLPI) are emerging, but translation is hindered by a lack of non-invasive biomarkers and the dual physiological/pathological roles of R-loops.
CONCLUSIONS: R-loops are central to brain disease pathogenesis, offering promising therapeutic targets. Future research should prioritize precision R-loop modulators, non-invasive biomarkers, and combinatorial strategies.