Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation · 2007
Relationship between vitamin D and muscle size and strength in patients on hemodialysis.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gordon Patricia L, Sakkas Giorgos K, Doyle Julie W, Shubert Tiffany, Johansen Kirsten L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Vitamin D has various actions in skeletal muscle. The purpose of this study was to compare lower-limb muscle size and strength in hemodialysis (HD) patients being treated with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol) or a 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D analogue (paricalcitol) with lower-limb muscle size and strength in HD patients who were receiving none.
DESIGN: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study.
SETTING: This study was performed in outpatient HD centers.
PATIENTS: Hemodialysis patients receiving calcitriol or paricalcitol (active vitamin D) for control of secondary hyperparathyroidism (VitD, n = 49) were compared with HD patients who were not (n = 30).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures included the cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of the thigh and tibialis anterior muscles by magnetic resonance imaging, and three measures of strength: the three-repetition maximum (3RM) for knee extension (isotonic), the peak torque of knee extensors (isokinetic), and maximal voluntary contraction of the ankle dorsiflexor muscles (isometric).
RESULTS: There were no differences in age, weight, dialysis vintage, or intact parathyroid hormone levels between groups, although serum albumin was higher in the VitD group (P < .05). Patients in the VitD group had a larger thigh-muscle CSA (P < .05) and were stronger across all strength measures (P < .05) after controlling for age and gender (by analysis of covariance). When all analyses were subsequently adjusted for serum albumin concentration, only the difference in 3RM knee-extension strength lost significance. There were no significant differences in any measurements between patients who received calcitriol or paricalcitol.
CONCLUSION: Treatment with active vitamin D was associated with greater muscle size and strength in this cohort of HD patients.
DESIGN: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study.
SETTING: This study was performed in outpatient HD centers.
PATIENTS: Hemodialysis patients receiving calcitriol or paricalcitol (active vitamin D) for control of secondary hyperparathyroidism (VitD, n = 49) were compared with HD patients who were not (n = 30).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures included the cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of the thigh and tibialis anterior muscles by magnetic resonance imaging, and three measures of strength: the three-repetition maximum (3RM) for knee extension (isotonic), the peak torque of knee extensors (isokinetic), and maximal voluntary contraction of the ankle dorsiflexor muscles (isometric).
RESULTS: There were no differences in age, weight, dialysis vintage, or intact parathyroid hormone levels between groups, although serum albumin was higher in the VitD group (P < .05). Patients in the VitD group had a larger thigh-muscle CSA (P < .05) and were stronger across all strength measures (P < .05) after controlling for age and gender (by analysis of covariance). When all analyses were subsequently adjusted for serum albumin concentration, only the difference in 3RM knee-extension strength lost significance. There were no significant differences in any measurements between patients who received calcitriol or paricalcitol.
CONCLUSION: Treatment with active vitamin D was associated with greater muscle size and strength in this cohort of HD patients.