MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5427

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of gastroenterology · 2015

Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma: A case report.

Knezevic Srbislav, Ignjatovic Igor, Lukic Snezana, Matic Slavko, Dugalic Vladimir, Knezevic Djordje, Micev Marjan, Dragasevic Sanja

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystic tumors are extremely rare. These tumors can be classified as a primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma with or without borderline malignancy or primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. The most common of these is primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma, which almost always occurs in female patients; only ten cases have been reported in males. The most common clinical findings for this tumor type include nonspecific abdominal pain and a palpable abdominal mass. A definitive diagnosis is usually obtained from histopathology after surgical excision. Here, we report the case of a 60-year-old female patient who complained of abdominal pain that had been present for 3 mo and presented with a palpable abdominal mass. Multidetector computed tomography scanning revealed a large, unilocular cystic mass in the left retroperitoneal space. Surgical intervention was performed and the tumor was completely removed. Histopathologic examination confirmed that the tumor was a primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma. Two years after surgery, the patient remains disease free.

Для цитирования: Knezevic Srbislav, Ignjatovic Igor, Lukic Snezana, Matic Slavko, Dugalic Vladimir, Knezevic Djordje, Micev Marjan, Dragasevic Sanja. Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma: A case report.. World journal of gastroenterology. 2015. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5427.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.