MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00784-025-06255-y

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical oral investigations · 2025

In-patient comparison of marginal bone loss after 4 months in immediately loaded, submucosal, and transmucosal dental implants using 3D scanning: a prospective clinical trial.

Sokolowski Armin, Lorenzoni Martin, Steyer Elisabeth, Marschner Felix, Pichler Anke, Sokolowski Alwin

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеКлиническое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and impact of different treatment protocols - immediate loading using a round gold bar retained overdenture on two implants, submucosal healing, and transmucosal healing - on circumferential marginal bone levels around dental implants.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

20 patients requiring six implants in the edentulous lower jaw were included. Within each patient, 2 implants were assigned to submucosal healing, transmucosal healing, or immediate loading protocols. Marginal bone loss (MBL) was evaluated using 3D scanning at implant placement and after 4 months while raising a full-thickness flap. Periotest values (PTVs), the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) and regular clinical evaluations were conducted for up to 2 years.

RESULTS

The submucosal group exhibited the least mean vertical MBL (-0.22 mm), significantly lower than the immediate (-0.39 mm) and transmucosal (-0.36 mm) groups (P = .001). Peri-implant bone surface area reduction was lowest in the submucosal group (-0.87 mm²) compared to the transmucosal (-4.58 mm²) and immediate (-6.66 mm²) protocols (P = .002). One submucosal healed implant and two immediately loaded implants were lost. Immediate loading provided high patient comfort and demonstrated successful outcomes both in terms of clinical data (PTVs, MBL) and patient-reported outcome measures (OHIP-14, VAS).

CONCLUSIONS

Submucosal and transmucosal healing protocols resulted in better marginal bone preservation compared to immediate loading. Although immediate loading enhanced patient comfort, it was associated with higher marginal bone loss.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study highlights the potential advantages of submucosal healing for marginal bone preservation and supports the use of three-dimensional scanning for precise bone loss evaluation, guiding clinical decision-making in implantology.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06408506.

Для цитирования: Sokolowski Armin, Lorenzoni Martin, Steyer Elisabeth, Marschner Felix, Pichler Anke, Sokolowski Alwin. In-patient comparison of marginal bone loss after 4 months in immediately loaded, submucosal, and transmucosal dental implants using 3D scanning: a prospective clinical trial.. Clinical oral investigations. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-025-06255-y.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.