Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for Secondary Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Long-Term Results.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Litwinowicz Radoslaw, Bartus Magdalena, Malec-Litwinowicz Michalina, Michalski Michal, Banaszkiewicz Krzysztof, Kapelak Boguslaw, Lakkireddy Dhanunjaya, Bartus Krzysztof
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients surviving an initial stroke present a significantly increased risk for further strokes. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) became an alternative treatment to pharmacological therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of LAAC in primary and secondary stroke prevention in patients with AF.
METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 139 patients following LAAC who were divided into 2 groups: 37 patients with prior stroke (Stroke Group) and 102 patients without stroke (Control Group). Overall, cumulative follow-up was 530.1 patient-years.
RESULTS: Mean CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc scores, and HAS-BLED score were higher in patients with prior stroke compared to patients without stroke (3.0 vs. 1.4, p < 0.0001 and 4.6 vs. 2.3, p < 0.0001, 4.0 vs. 2.8, p < 0.0001, respectively). There were no significant differences between other patient factors (sex, heart failure, hypertension, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack, peripheral vascular disease), which may increase the risk of thromboembolism based on the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Average follow-up was 51.3 months in patients with previous stroke and 50 months in patients without previous stroke. Thromboembolic event rate was 0.8 vs. 0.5 (p = 0.72), bleeding event rate was 0 years vs. 1.4 (p = 0.25), and mortality rates were 0.8 vs. 2.1 (p = 0.38) between the Stroke Group and the Control Group. The estimated reductions in thromboembolic and bleeding risks were 89 and 100%, respectively, in Stroke Group, and 91 and 81%, respectively, in Control Group.
CONCLUSION: Patients with prior stroke may be the preferred group for LAAC regardless of the presence or absence of contraindications for anticoagulant therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of LAAC in primary and secondary stroke prevention in patients with AF.
METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 139 patients following LAAC who were divided into 2 groups: 37 patients with prior stroke (Stroke Group) and 102 patients without stroke (Control Group). Overall, cumulative follow-up was 530.1 patient-years.
RESULTS: Mean CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc scores, and HAS-BLED score were higher in patients with prior stroke compared to patients without stroke (3.0 vs. 1.4, p < 0.0001 and 4.6 vs. 2.3, p < 0.0001, 4.0 vs. 2.8, p < 0.0001, respectively). There were no significant differences between other patient factors (sex, heart failure, hypertension, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack, peripheral vascular disease), which may increase the risk of thromboembolism based on the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Average follow-up was 51.3 months in patients with previous stroke and 50 months in patients without previous stroke. Thromboembolic event rate was 0.8 vs. 0.5 (p = 0.72), bleeding event rate was 0 years vs. 1.4 (p = 0.25), and mortality rates were 0.8 vs. 2.1 (p = 0.38) between the Stroke Group and the Control Group. The estimated reductions in thromboembolic and bleeding risks were 89 and 100%, respectively, in Stroke Group, and 91 and 81%, respectively, in Control Group.
CONCLUSION: Patients with prior stroke may be the preferred group for LAAC regardless of the presence or absence of contraindications for anticoagulant therapy.