Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
Appalachian Women's perspectives on preterm birth and transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening: Implications for addressing disparities in preterm birth.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moloney Mairead E, Hansen Anna, Cockerham-Morris Cynthia T, Li Jing, Chavan Niraj R
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Preterm birth (PTB), a pressing issue for US maternal-child health, disproportionately impacts women in Appalachia. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) cervical length (CL) screening is the most accurate PTB risk predictor but remains underutilized. This study characterizes the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of patients with prior PTB concerning PTB prevention efforts and TVU CL screening.
METHODS: Participants were recruited from community-based health centers in Appalachian Kentucky. Semi-structured interviews and likert-scale surveys were conducted with 22 pregnant women with a history of spontaneous PTB. Methods for data collection were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
RESULTS: Most participants reported that TVU was uncomfortable, but none refused it. Most women were able to articulate the benefits of TVU, but several had concerns about its safety in pregnancy. Participants suggested that pregnant women receive more PTB education and self-advocate. They urged providers to take patient concerns seriously, and better educate patients on PTB risks and TVU safety.
DISCUSSION: Our study contributes crucial insights about the experience of a vulnerable population as it pertains to PTB prevention and the uptake of TVU CL screening. Our findings emphasize the need for increased efforts to better educate patients on the impact of prematurity and the safety and benefits of TVU CL screening as an evidence-based strategy for PTB prevention.
METHODS: Participants were recruited from community-based health centers in Appalachian Kentucky. Semi-structured interviews and likert-scale surveys were conducted with 22 pregnant women with a history of spontaneous PTB. Methods for data collection were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
RESULTS: Most participants reported that TVU was uncomfortable, but none refused it. Most women were able to articulate the benefits of TVU, but several had concerns about its safety in pregnancy. Participants suggested that pregnant women receive more PTB education and self-advocate. They urged providers to take patient concerns seriously, and better educate patients on PTB risks and TVU safety.
DISCUSSION: Our study contributes crucial insights about the experience of a vulnerable population as it pertains to PTB prevention and the uptake of TVU CL screening. Our findings emphasize the need for increased efforts to better educate patients on the impact of prematurity and the safety and benefits of TVU CL screening as an evidence-based strategy for PTB prevention.