Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology · 2006
Pressure-induced gastric accommodation studied with a new distension paradigm. Abnormally low accommodation rate in patients with functional dyspepsia.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lunding Johan A, Tefera Solomon, Bayati Alfred, Gilja Odd Helge, Mattsson Hillevi, Hausken Trygve, Berstad Arnold
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: A new distension paradigm, by which the gastric volume response to ramp-tonic distension can be analysed in detail, has been developed. The aim of this study was to investigate the applicability of this new paradigm in man, and to compare pressure-induced gastric accommodation in healthy volunteers (HV) and patients with functional dyspepsia (FD).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten HV, and 11 FD patients were examined twice; once in the fasting state and once postprandially. Intragastric bag pressure was raised from 1 to 12 mmHg in 4 min (ramp phase) and then kept constant for 5 min (tonic phase).
RESULTS: Compared to HV, fasting FD patients had lower gastric accommodation rates (0.9+/-0.2 versus 2.5+/-0.4 ml/s, p=0.002), lower maximum volume (239+/-39 versus 428+/-64 ml, p=0.01) and a longer accommodation time (157+/-26 versus 92+/-15 s, p=0.03). A test meal prior to distension tended to normalize the response in FD patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This new barostat paradigm allowed detailed analysis of short-term pressure-induced accommodation in man. Impaired gastric distension-induced accommodation is a novel abnormality in FD.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten HV, and 11 FD patients were examined twice; once in the fasting state and once postprandially. Intragastric bag pressure was raised from 1 to 12 mmHg in 4 min (ramp phase) and then kept constant for 5 min (tonic phase).
RESULTS: Compared to HV, fasting FD patients had lower gastric accommodation rates (0.9+/-0.2 versus 2.5+/-0.4 ml/s, p=0.002), lower maximum volume (239+/-39 versus 428+/-64 ml, p=0.01) and a longer accommodation time (157+/-26 versus 92+/-15 s, p=0.03). A test meal prior to distension tended to normalize the response in FD patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This new barostat paradigm allowed detailed analysis of short-term pressure-induced accommodation in man. Impaired gastric distension-induced accommodation is a novel abnormality in FD.